Condos for sale pickering . Ontario will expand the power of land expropriation. Reduce EIA to speed up the progress of transportation projects. The construction of rapid traffic legislation and related regulatory changes will enable the construction of the transport system to be completed more quickly, bringing benefits to the residents of the Greater Toronto area.
The introduction of new measures by the Ontario government will expand the power to expropriate land and reduce the requirements for environmental assessment, which hopes to speed up the progress of new transport projects and ensure the smooth completion of the project.
Caroline Mulroney, the director of transportation, said at the provincial council that the construction of rapid transit legislation (Building Transit Faster Act) and related regulatory changes could complete the construction of the transportation system faster and bring benefits to residents in the Greater Toronto area, the Star reported.
Caroline said that the government has the responsibility to complete the construction of the transport system on time and without overspending, so it cannot deal with the same thing in the same way, nor does it want the provincial people to be dissatisfied with the long-term overexpenditure and delay of the project for many years.
Some opposition members are of the view that a comprehensive assessment can only be conducted until the content of the proposal is provided by the Government, but they are concerned about the known changes. Among them, Mike Schreiner, the leader of the Green Party, pointed out that the rapid introduction of the public transport system in Ontario is the biggest challenge, and the government has actually abolished the current plan and broken the public transport system that has been in place for many years.
If passed, the law will deprive owners of the right to hold necessary hearings if their land is used for new transport projects.
However, the government said it would be introduced by the Department of the Environment to allow Metrolinx to carry out early work on transport projects before the environmental assessment process was completed. The policy applies only to the Ontario Line (Ontario Line), which is at the heart of Governor Ford’s 28.5 billion yuan transportation expansion plan, which accounts for 11 billion yuan. The provincial legislation includes:
With the consent of the owner, provincial representatives shall be authorized to enter the traffic works land to remove obstacles to construction, provided that appropriate notice is given and compensation for the damage is guaranteed.
Strengthen the relocation of utilities located on the roads of transport projects, such as telephones and sewers.
The Director of Transport is granted authority to allow independent provincial transport agencies to close urban roads or use municipal services such as potable water and sewers without reaching an agreement with the municipal authorities.
The relevant legislation and regulatory measures are only applicable to the Greater Toronto area of the province. The four priority transport projects are the Ontario Line, the Yonge Street North extension, the Scarborough extension and the Ellington West Light Rail Line.
Jessica Bell, a transport commentator for the New Democratic Party, said the party will identify obstacles to the development of transport projects, but it needs to do its best to investigate, while respecting the concerns of stakeholders and the community, in order to carry out proper projects and to plan carefully.
Guillaume Lavictoire, a land expropriation lawyer and president of the Ontario Land expropriation Association, pointed out that the ability of owners to defend expropriation and express their opinions at the hearing is limited. As things stand, the government does not have to abide by the results of the hearings and already has the power to cancel individual hearings through parliament.
Therefore, the hearing provides a place for owners to object to the expropriation of their land. If the independent official presiding over the case decides in favour of the property holder, the government can still expropriate the land, but may face political pressure.